has always been in the natural world works right strength. The one who won the confrontation of both the stronger for food, and of partners for reproduction. Hence, a stronger individual genes have a greater chance to survive and consolidate in the population. Stronger end of the end could do with a weaker, which only wanted to view behind the argument of force. Such natural law in which the stronger the lawmaker.
Weaker individuals not wanting to be doomed to the tyranny of another stronger contain non-aggression pact and join forces to repel attacks stronger. In this way, they are stronger, but still those resources which Arms must share among themselves. Among them the most important and so are stronger. Also win a confrontation between groups of groups that have a greater amount of force. For these battles, however, designate your group leader, which for some reason they consider to be the stronger.
Strength does not always mean physical strength. Often, the physical qualities are of less importance than the intellectual virtues. A clever person can defeat a stronger physically, using the power of his intelligence. Intelligent and charismatic individual is also able to exploit the strengths of other to fight the stronger. Also, the wealth of help in the use of force against others. The more different kinds of resources I have, the easier for me to buy the services of others - for equally intelligent and charismatic, and strong physically. Can I choose people for his army.
As you can see the different forces are calculated, but still one that is stronger, has unlimited power over those who are weaker. The structure of a democratic state slightly improves the situation. Camera strength is subordinated to the will of the people, that is the will of the majority. It is through their representatives, most constructed right. The law protects the weak from strong, until the stronger will be the majority that the law change. But either way is the camera strength upholds the rule of law. Is there a way to turn the kingdom of forces in the kingdom, where everyone has the same rights regardless of whether it is stronger, smarter, richer, and even whether it is in the majority?
my opinion, far too little is said about it. Accepted as a natural state in which you are right, which is more. Also, the media, which are governed by the laws of the market does not help us in the case. Not enough is meaningful debates about ethics and freedom, and too much about politics and the will of the majority. Too much calculation, and not enough consistency in the views. Is there a chance to improve the situation? Sure. But first we must awaken in themselves and their own environment awareness of the need for such debates. Awareness of the ethical basis for policy. If more people will want to talk about this, donośniejsze will also echo in the media. Maybe then grow up to to talk not about power but about freedom.
Weaker individuals not wanting to be doomed to the tyranny of another stronger contain non-aggression pact and join forces to repel attacks stronger. In this way, they are stronger, but still those resources which Arms must share among themselves. Among them the most important and so are stronger. Also win a confrontation between groups of groups that have a greater amount of force. For these battles, however, designate your group leader, which for some reason they consider to be the stronger.
Strength does not always mean physical strength. Often, the physical qualities are of less importance than the intellectual virtues. A clever person can defeat a stronger physically, using the power of his intelligence. Intelligent and charismatic individual is also able to exploit the strengths of other to fight the stronger. Also, the wealth of help in the use of force against others. The more different kinds of resources I have, the easier for me to buy the services of others - for equally intelligent and charismatic, and strong physically. Can I choose people for his army.
As you can see the different forces are calculated, but still one that is stronger, has unlimited power over those who are weaker. The structure of a democratic state slightly improves the situation. Camera strength is subordinated to the will of the people, that is the will of the majority. It is through their representatives, most constructed right. The law protects the weak from strong, until the stronger will be the majority that the law change. But either way is the camera strength upholds the rule of law. Is there a way to turn the kingdom of forces in the kingdom, where everyone has the same rights regardless of whether it is stronger, smarter, richer, and even whether it is in the majority?
my opinion, far too little is said about it. Accepted as a natural state in which you are right, which is more. Also, the media, which are governed by the laws of the market does not help us in the case. Not enough is meaningful debates about ethics and freedom, and too much about politics and the will of the majority. Too much calculation, and not enough consistency in the views. Is there a chance to improve the situation? Sure. But first we must awaken in themselves and their own environment awareness of the need for such debates. Awareness of the ethical basis for policy. If more people will want to talk about this, donośniejsze will also echo in the media. Maybe then grow up to to talk not about power but about freedom.
0 comments:
Post a Comment