getting stronger I feel that in life people are guided by a more well-trodden cultural patterns obyczajowymi than your own mind. Consider, for example, the ratio of employee to employer. As a free person undertake undertaking work in exchange for a fee. This is a contract and it is my duty to perform, as well as the obligation of the employer is paying my salary. So why do I expect from your employer premiums or other rewards?
Somehow, the staff for a job well done is a reward, is working efficiently. Does the employment relationship itself does not require maximum commitment? So why use the proverbial "carrot"? Since the "carrot" fulfills its function, it means that the employee does not engage without the maximum of their resources. It may therefore be to consider whether failing to comply the contract he has concluded the same, voluntarily. Did primitive motivational technique is not a stronger incentive than reason, which requires to discharge its own obligations?
second option is that a person according to the dictates of reason involves the maximum of its resources, to which it committed to in the contract. "Carrot" has only lead to something more involved. But if so, why not have that in the contract? Why the employer did not offer that right away? Why could not? Maybe the employee could not have made greater commitments? So maybe the positive motivational techniques to be a way to circumvent restrictive labor law? Anyway
like "carrot" does the proverbial "stick". The prospect of a penalty also effectively motivated to work. But the agreement itself is not enough? Here there is no possibility that the punishment was a way to circumvent the labor law. Can not be legally punished for it, for which the employee is not required the employment relationship. So, apparently awaiting the prospect of punishment is more effective than self-motivation emanating solely from reason.
What makes a man in the animal kingdom is the reason. Is the use of motivational techniques and pandering is therefore not an admission that reason, in our lives does not have such great importance? Is this behavior does not deprive ourselves of humanity? Do not put in a situation above his ass on the attached illustration of the movie Fishing Mania? In the end it was the other animals have no reason and motivates them to act such techniques?
Somehow, the staff for a job well done is a reward, is working efficiently. Does the employment relationship itself does not require maximum commitment? So why use the proverbial "carrot"? Since the "carrot" fulfills its function, it means that the employee does not engage without the maximum of their resources. It may therefore be to consider whether failing to comply the contract he has concluded the same, voluntarily. Did primitive motivational technique is not a stronger incentive than reason, which requires to discharge its own obligations?
second option is that a person according to the dictates of reason involves the maximum of its resources, to which it committed to in the contract. "Carrot" has only lead to something more involved. But if so, why not have that in the contract? Why the employer did not offer that right away? Why could not? Maybe the employee could not have made greater commitments? So maybe the positive motivational techniques to be a way to circumvent restrictive labor law? Anyway
like "carrot" does the proverbial "stick". The prospect of a penalty also effectively motivated to work. But the agreement itself is not enough? Here there is no possibility that the punishment was a way to circumvent the labor law. Can not be legally punished for it, for which the employee is not required the employment relationship. So, apparently awaiting the prospect of punishment is more effective than self-motivation emanating solely from reason.
What makes a man in the animal kingdom is the reason. Is the use of motivational techniques and pandering is therefore not an admission that reason, in our lives does not have such great importance? Is this behavior does not deprive ourselves of humanity? Do not put in a situation above his ass on the attached illustration of the movie Fishing Mania? In the end it was the other animals have no reason and motivates them to act such techniques?
0 comments:
Post a Comment