Dry White Spots On Dog Nose

the new year

I will not wish health, nor happiness nor fulfillment of dreams and execution of vital goals. I will not wish wise champagne New Year's resolutions or upcoming fun night. I think that such thinking, every listener is sufficiently before the zero hour. I would like to wish for the coming year has been to draw conclusions and repair nadszarpniętych ties. That you to everyone approached a man on each other with respect, love and kindness. For errors that undoubtedly popełnicie were forgiven and the end of the end is aided by the strengthening of interpersonal relationships. You to remember that God is found only in the face of another human being.

Yours hot.

Jason Comet Telescope

stick and carrot

getting stronger I feel that in life people are guided by a more well-trodden cultural patterns obyczajowymi than your own mind. Consider, for example, the ratio of employee to employer. As a free person undertake undertaking work in exchange for a fee. This is a contract and it is my duty to perform, as well as the obligation of the employer is paying my salary. So why do I expect from your employer premiums or other rewards?

Somehow, the staff for a job well done is a reward, is working efficiently. Does the employment relationship itself does not require maximum commitment? So why use the proverbial "carrot"? Since the "carrot" fulfills its function, it means that the employee does not engage without the maximum of their resources. It may therefore be to consider whether failing to comply the contract he has concluded the same, voluntarily. Did primitive motivational technique is not a stronger incentive than reason, which requires to discharge its own obligations?

second option is that a person according to the dictates of reason involves the maximum of its resources, to which it committed to in the contract. "Carrot" has only lead to something more involved. But if so, why not have that in the contract? Why the employer did not offer that right away? Why could not? Maybe the employee could not have made greater commitments? So maybe the positive motivational techniques to be a way to circumvent restrictive labor law? Anyway

like "carrot" does the proverbial "stick". The prospect of a penalty also effectively motivated to work. But the agreement itself is not enough? Here there is no possibility that the punishment was a way to circumvent the labor law. Can not be legally punished for it, for which the employee is not required the employment relationship. So, apparently awaiting the prospect of punishment is more effective than self-motivation emanating solely from reason.


What makes a man in the animal kingdom is the reason. Is the use of motivational techniques and pandering is therefore not an admission that reason, in our lives does not have such great importance? Is this behavior does not deprive ourselves of humanity? Do not put in a situation above his ass on the attached illustration of the movie Fishing Mania? In the end it was the other animals have no reason and motivates them to act such techniques?

Animal Print Customizable Pinnies

Merry Christmas

a very long time I was not. The reason is very important and complicated, but I slowly begin to give you advice.

all, who they look to me here, and those who are flight, I wish above all peace and joy. Loved one at his side. Support, warmth and sense of security. Self-confidence and strength. Around each other only those people who do not turn their backs in a difficult situation. Same joyful moments, the dream. Perseverance, patience and humility. Craziness. Love and understanding.
a merry Christmas.

picture comes from the http://crazy-frankenstein.com/free-wallpapers-files/

Star Wars Toddler Bathing Suits

love God, love man

Increasingly, I wonder whether there is a place where not a surprise waiting for us. Recently browsed portal demotywatory.pl and landed on the brilliant mind of Karol Wojtyla:

How can you love God who is invisible does not love a man who is near us?

I think it's a rhetorical question can be left without comment.

Letter Of Settlement For Car Accident Template

Problems with forgiveness

In every relationship with another person we are dealing with the ups and downs. Often we hurt feelings in some way the other person, often act to its detriment, for various reasons. The realization of evil is the first step in overcoming it, but what to do next? What if we stand on this side, which has been hurt in some way?

Pretending that nothing happened is just creating an illusion. Instead wound to heal, it will be shadowed and the inside will be sensitive to digest the tissue of interpersonal relationships. Intuitively, we conclude that in order to strengthen the relationship tarnished, we need a double-acting. One side must repent, and one must forgive. Forgive and forget. Do not displace the memory of bad moments, but learn from them for the future. On the other hand, you have to truly forgive and give up entirely blame.

But what to do if the same evil is repeated many times? Can we still trust the sincerity of repentance of the other person? Is forgiving the wrongs committed, not give the silent acceptance of this action, playing down the wrong which we have experienced? How to solve this problem?

First we must realize that something in this situation is not so. We are here to a twofold evil. The first problem is specific harm that was caused and can be forgiven in the normal way. However, apart from the specific harm, we are dealing with another, bigger and more serious evil. It is the abuse of forgiveness. This offense is much more complicated. The impact is not only the body itself in our relationship, but in its spirit, in its very essence. In the trust. Can we trust the person who abused our trust?

Is guilty of abuse of forgiveness, forgiveness can ever be made? Do the same abuse of the pardon, does not degrade its importance? The end of the end will bring the relationship to the point where we seem to forgive, even though deep down we realize that nothing changes. That there are no proposals for the future. That still will repeat the same thing. So how do you do that it did not happen? Maybe you just have to carry out a frank conversation and think about what to do next. Maybe you need is not just forgiveness, but a deep inner transformation. Is there another way to save the trust? Or is it just the wine that can not be truly forgive?

Squishing His Stomach

Eutyfron and pious deeds of good and evil

brilliance of mind of Socrates is unique. With Plato's dialogues, many of the acquis remain in our culture. One of the works of Plato, describing one of the conversations of Socrates is Eutyfron. Accused of treason, spoiling the youth and many others drawn from the hat acts in court philosopher meets a friend who reported to his father in the name of his own virtue. While this raises the question of what is pious deed and what is not, Socrates maneuvers conversation so that it must withdraw Eutyfron potrafiwszy not find the words of the philosopher's defense.

One of the most interesting moments of the discussion is to talk about what is pious and what is not. Eutyfron in one sentence says that the pious is what pleases the gods. However, when asked what pleases the gods, he replied that what is pious. However, there is no guidance or to the settlement, which is really pious, or what the gods want. Socrates immediately complains that a god can have pleasure in something other than the second. So, when the data are conflicting values, whether both are pious, or none of them is not. This is what one pleases, there will be another like it. Is there any action that will be liked everything?

This argument is one of the main negative polytheism. But not against polytheism I would like to write, but against the definition of good and evil, by what pleases God or not. The truth is that even assuming that God exists, what we know about him? Can we categorically assert any ground, what God wants and what is not? We may presume that God will be pleased with the good, but if we can on that basis to say what specific action he would liked? It is impossible to define in this way, good and evil. Denying, we stand on the side of the hopeless Eutyfrona dispute against Socrates.

Immanuel Kant in the Metaphysics of morals , without denying the existence of God, suggests the need to exit right from the very humanity, and not pleasing to God. So how do we define what is good and what is wrong? I recommend my previous entry.

Virtual Game Where You Can Give Birth

Is it aware of what is good and bad leads us to the moral sense? Can the moral sense to designate what is good and what is wrong? As a general definition of good and evil? These and many other questions arise when we try a minute to think about it. It should deal with this important subject.

Let's start with the good. It is very difficult to imagine in isolation from evil. Most acts as his antagonism. When someone does not do anything wrong, then it shall be deemed good man. You do not have even specifically to do anything good, just not be bad. In fact, it does not explain the specificity we are good, but only by denying the specificity of evil. Let's try to approach this from the right side. Consider the good in isolation from evil. What is good?

good is used not only in terms of ethics. We are talking about material things and spiritual. Our material goods are the items that mean something to us, they are worth something. My asset is my house, my books, my car and a lot of different things. They are all my possessions. But my is also a good family, friends, peace of mind. My goods are also intelligence, reason, faith, love. As can be seen that concept is very broad. However, common to all these material and spiritual wealth is that they have for me, their own value.

try to transfer this concept to the field of ethics. What is my value in relation to another human being? First of all humanity. I want the other person saw me as a man. I want my trust and I trust him alone. I want to be with him a free person who takes responsibility for decisions made. I want them to represent me the truth. I want it to be a spolegliwą (which, contrary to the meaning potocznemu not mean a person who is submissive, but a person you can rely on.) I think a lot of such values \u200b\u200bcould still be replaced. These are all good for us morally. The entire space of such values, we can call general good, in the sense of ethics.

immediately imposes a definition of evil. If you are in a relationship with someone, admit to any attack on any of the value of good, committing evil. Evil is therefore uzwierzęcanie man, breach of confidence, any kind of slavery, lying, and many other activities, which we must avoid hitting the good at the same time. We see at once that both good and evil in the sense of ethical, are closely related to the relationship, which connects me with another man.

moral sense, not to be confused with a sense of guilt (about this another time) is the ability to move throughout the space agathological, which is determined between the two extremes - good and evil. It is the ability to resolve conflicts between the lesser and the greater good, but also the ability to choose the lesser evil. Obviously created by a clear understanding of the nature of good and evil, but thanks to him we can also distinguish between good and evil in everyday life. But do not wiążmy concept of good and evil man. Whether a person is good or bad, leave unrated. We evaluate only the action, because only these actions may affect our interpersonal relationships.

Swollen Toe For No Reason

Perseverance in prayer

Here's another piece of the Sermon on the Mount:

Ask and you shall receive, seek, and ye shall find; knock and the door will be opened. For everyone who asks receives, he who seeks finds; and knocks open. of you whom if his son asks for bread, is one that will give him a stone? Or if he ask a fish, will give him a serpent? If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more shall your Father which is in heaven give good things to those who ask him.

So how to reconcile this passage with that, what Christ himself said a few moments earlier on the same mountain ? Why ask the Father, since it knows what we need? But Jesus himself set an example that you should pray. He taught us even words. Prayer, however, is no passive waiting for grace, but an active wybieganiem the future. By expressing the request, declare the action to its fulfillment. As long as we ask, we act, we will knock at the people's hearts, until we open. We look for good gifts among the people, until we find it.

By request we make a decision. We give an expression of what we want. Therefore, we do not ask, here is what we need, because it is known to our Father. That will ensure our instinct, our nature. Our thoughts and reason, we refer to what we can give to the world, and not what we learned from it. If we ask for the kingdom of heaven, we will pursue them, and thus it will settle in our hearts and in our world. From his perspective we look at the world in which we want to give, not take.