Monday, March 28, 2011

Annoucment Letter New Employee

better world

As I often listen to the people next to each other, and the echo of these been told him by accident, I wonder how in the world so much sorrow and complaint. People complain that the diseases that trouble is that there is no work that so much evil around. In fact, the more he hears about all this than a dozen or so years ago, but why there is not surprising. Free media are full of sensation seeking, and whoever wrote the article about someone who is still healthy, who does not suffer from poverty, who normally works, who is normally a good man. I guess there is no doubt that the vast majority of people live in each day. Of course, not suitable for a hero of history, because who wants to read about this gray przeciętniaku.

But in all this is something that worries. Concerned that, however, there are people who make others wrong. Perhaps even more worrying to us, that we view the world in which man does not give the hand of another. In a world full of indifference. Somewhere in the heart we want a different world. One in which a man loves another man. We live in hope that after death, if only "decent"'ll live to see the end, waiting for us another, better world. Instead of living here and now, we live in hope for a better tomorrow. Meanwhile, we forget that as long as only one of the world belongs to us. Then the world here and now.

We live in a better world? So instead of living the hope that a better world will come, we need to pursue it here. And I'm not talking about revolution or the establishment of political parties. I'm talking about everyday life. If we want a world in which man speaks to man the truth, we must first tell the truth to another human. If you lie, it will automatically build a world in which someone who lied, not that's it. Of course, telling the truth will not make all at once would speak the truth. However, failure to tell the truth cause that not everyone will speak the truth, because we're no longer the exception. If you want to live in a world where man forgives man, we need to forgive, because if you do not forgive, then we will be those who do not forgive.

You have to realize that we create a world in which we live. And so far as it will create, in which we live. Do not let them tell you that the world was created once, and now only need to experience this effect. Every day, every second we create our world. We're making history of the world, which has lead him to salvation. So let us take advantage of the reflective time of Lent, and consider a moment of self-investigation. Let's try to direct our actions towards our desired world. Realizujmy him in the only world that we have - in a world here and now.

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Milena Velba Milk 2004



In our deliberations on the Sermon on the Mount inevitably approaching its end. The next chapter is short:

Therefore all things ye would that men should do unto you, and you them do to you! For this is the law and the prophets.

This sentence perfectly reflects the maxim: a minimum of words - maximum content. No need to replace things permitted or recommended, or prohibited or condemned. Two sentences short enough so that everyone in the silence of his mind he could self-assess their own practice. Just put yourself in the place of another person, to see if my action is positive or negative.

Anyway, this wisdom is known in the form of proverbs and sayings. Nearby content is probably Do not do to others what you unpleasant. Christ goes a bit further. Not only do we refrain from evil deeds, but we actively work for the needy neighbor. God's whole law is, to put another human being in the center, the target of their actions. All its activities Christ proves that God is where the second man. And God, not only do not do evil, but you should make him a victim. Do not sacrifice the blood, but the sacrifice of love.

easy, however, to conclude that the second person may need an entirely different purpose than I do. What is the point so he is doing what he would want for yourself? Do not fall into the trap of self-centredness again when trying to find the second man only their own needs and desires? This task, however, is not difficult.

Once we have reason to be able to put myself in a situation of another human being. I currently need something, but I can imagine myself in a situation of someone who needs something else. I can not even find answer to the question whether the finding in this situation I would like to help? Sometimes I do not want help. And sometimes I do not want to admit that I need it. Are we able to approach another man, both with care and with understanding? Can we give so that the neighbor on the other side was not ashamed to take? This task seems much harder. But if Christ has promised that it would be easy?

Sunday, March 6, 2011

Whats Good With Fishsticks

golden rule of conduct between the heart and the sense

concepts of duality of man dates back to very ancient times. Probably the best was holding the theory of dualism body and spirit. A man with one hand is being subjected to physical and drives and instincts. On the other is a spiritual being, to be. Both these interests are fighting, and destruction of the battle field refer to as consciousness. Freud's theory also deserves mention. On one hand, animal needs, on the other's cultural heritage. Id vs. Superego. What is the result of this fight? The ego, or consciousness.

But there is still a dualistic approach, which most probably affects at the present time. Heart versus reason. On the one hand, the man acts impulsively, is subjected to time doing what he wants to do at the moment. The other has a broader perspective, which leads him to take into account the profitability of the operation. Sometimes winning momentum, moments of deliberation. Contrary to popular opinion, I do not believe that either one is (to paraphrase the title of a Jane Austen novel), prudent, or romantic. Depending on the specific circumstances of every man behaves prudently, and once elsewhere impulsively.

I will not, here dwell on it, which procedure is better, because I believe that both are inadequate. Somewhere in fact, between What fun and what cost we lose one more criterion - the good. Listening to the pulse, you can do well or badly. Similarly, if you listen to reason. And sometimes, or listening to one or the other, do not choose a good path.

When the impulse leads us to the remaining surplus funds to us, buy yourself something that makes us joy, and makes sense, save for harder times, absorbed in a solution to this dilemma, we forget that there is another alternative. Somewhere, very close to us, may be someone to whom the money may be needed at this point. Do we care for the indefinite future, or to fulfill their own desires, if there is a chance to do something good?

When two popular options that are fighting for our attention, it's worth a look if your impudence by chance we do not cover third party, the best way.