How beautiful you can play with words. The actual restriction of freedom suddenly presents itself as a libertarian's action. If I want to open a facility in which anyone can sit at a table, read a newspaper, drink beer and smoke a cigarette and are willing to visit me in such a place, what is anyone bother? After all, nobody is forcing him to enter. That is freedom. I can open a place which I like because I do it with their own funds. Customers can visit me, agreeing to terms and profile site, which I created, or can not visit me. Everyone has a choice and everyone can take a corresponding decision. Meanwhile
extracted bully comes and tells me: "I do not like that with you is so smoke. Nasty to me sitting here. How will you continue to smoke cigarettes with you, I'll come with my friends, breaks into your cash and take as much as I deem appropriate. I want to be free from smoke. "His reply," And if anyone forces you, you come here? This is my place. Do you like it, find yourself another, or create your own. "So it expected to get the retort:" Shut up. We have more and we are stronger. As you stood with her it's still gonna get you. We want freedom. "
course, the crowd that is behind this osiłkiem with pleasure marinas in this concept of freedom, because it is his wrist. Maybe someday even become a proper definition of freedom, where for many years, people will continue to use this term in a similar context. But for now, the situation is contrary to the concept of freedom. You can be smoke-free, whenever you want. Just that you do not come to my house. You would like for it to have it all. And my property and no smoke. Thus, you want to limit my ability to dispose of their assets. Who here is on the side of freedom?
PS. I'm not a landlord. I hate cigarettes and cigarette smoke. I appreciate the initiative of non-smoking. But the more I value human freedom and firmly opposed to such a verbal manipulation.
extracted bully comes and tells me: "I do not like that with you is so smoke. Nasty to me sitting here. How will you continue to smoke cigarettes with you, I'll come with my friends, breaks into your cash and take as much as I deem appropriate. I want to be free from smoke. "His reply," And if anyone forces you, you come here? This is my place. Do you like it, find yourself another, or create your own. "So it expected to get the retort:" Shut up. We have more and we are stronger. As you stood with her it's still gonna get you. We want freedom. "
course, the crowd that is behind this osiłkiem with pleasure marinas in this concept of freedom, because it is his wrist. Maybe someday even become a proper definition of freedom, where for many years, people will continue to use this term in a similar context. But for now, the situation is contrary to the concept of freedom. You can be smoke-free, whenever you want. Just that you do not come to my house. You would like for it to have it all. And my property and no smoke. Thus, you want to limit my ability to dispose of their assets. Who here is on the side of freedom?
PS. I'm not a landlord. I hate cigarettes and cigarette smoke. I appreciate the initiative of non-smoking. But the more I value human freedom and firmly opposed to such a verbal manipulation.
0 comments:
Post a Comment